🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, Battlefield Studios introduced a new game mode titled Casual Breakthrough. In essence, this option mirrors the standard Breakthrough format but includes a few key adjustments:

• Every squad includes just 8 human participants, with the remaining filled by 32 bots.
• Activities done by real players grant complete experience points, while bot actions provide lower rewards.
• Just a pair of maps can be played: Cairo Siege and Empire State.
• Features like Player tags, accolades, and career stat updates have been turned off.

So essentially, the playlist lives up to its title: it offers a casual version of Breakthrough. At face value, you might think it's a good idea, as it gives additional choices for players seeking alternative methods to have fun with the title. But, if video games have taught us anything, it is that not everyone will be happy. Which is to say, a lot of Battlefield 6 players are upset.

Player Responses: Anger to Praise

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Avoid making the errors of your rivals," states one reply to the mode reveal. "Truly disappointing concept," says another. Meanwhile, on the Battlefield subreddit, a player notes, "It's unclear where we are headed with this title," and someone else details everything they consider to be problematic in Battlefield 6: "Resolve glitches, address drone issues, correct rocket mechanics, adjust aiming after sprinting, fix awful hit registration. We do not require this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, for every complaint, some gamers explaining how much they're liking the recent addition. "It's enjoyable to warm up, human participants keep it from being a complete grind but it's very relaxed," reads a forum post. "The community fails to see that there are gamers who have lives and don't play this game all the time. Let them find a middle ground," adds a different comment. One reply on Twitter explains that as they're "a battledad with busy schedules, this is great for me," while another applauds the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Constructive Criticisms and Community Input

Despite the support, there are constructive reasons to complain about the new mode. A few folks have highlighted that it could increase queue times even longer for other modes because of the large amount of options currently available. Similarly, some areas already encounter mostly bots in the existing playlists. It also seems a little backwards that the mode won't start without a required amount of real players, despite it primarily centers on combat against bots.

Lastly, one of the biggest grievances is that Battlefield Portal was meant to offer complete rewards, including AI matches, but that got canned when they tried to eliminate XP farming from the mode. So Casual Breakthrough seems like the player base compromising in the middle, as per a Reddit comment. A different user labels this addition as the developers "dropping the ball so hard, I experienced so much fun in the initial release, what prompted them to adjust it?"

Looking Ahead: Will Changes Be Made?

If Battlefield Studios has proven anything to date with the latest installment, it is that they're paying attention and responding to player input. Assignments being too difficult were adjusted rapidly, just like the required Redsec challenges. It is likely that, should analytics shows this recent mode is underperforming to their expectations, they won't be shy to make further modifications.